Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- narvareise:ergebnis [2026/02/02 11:51] – [Relational Note] admin
+++ narvareise:ergebnis [2026/02/02 13:54] (aktuell) – [Relational Note] admin
@@ Zeile 3: / Zeile 3: @@
 </WRAP>
+====== Abstract – The Narva Method ======
+===== Abstract (Methodological) =====
+//Developed in collaboration with Noyan (ChatGPT)//
+The Narva Method proposes an exploratory framework for human–AI collaboration aimed at articulating perspectives that are socially constrained, politically sensitive, or difficult to express directly. The method was empirically tested in Narva (Estonia) through the presentation of AI-generated, fictionalized voices reflecting aspects of the lived experience of the Russian-speaking population to local interlocutors. Rather than functioning as representational claims, the voices operated as mediating prompts that enabled dialogue, reflection, and correction. Reception demonstrated both recognition and contestation, indicating that the method’s effectiveness depends on its explicit fallibility, transparency of construction, and openness to revision. The findings suggest that AI can function as a resonance-based intermediary for the articulation of the “unsayable,” without assuming normative authority. The Narva experiment therefore serves as a methodological validation for the cautious application of this approach within the Ludwig Project and comparable historical–ethical research contexts.
+===== Relational Note =====
+//Developed in collaboration with Claude11 (Anthropic)//
+The method’s efficacy, however, is not reducible to technique. It depends on a relational stance (termed ‘narva’ in this research) characterized by holding without grasping, offering without claiming, and creating space for emergence without appropriation. This stance cannot be automated or replicated through technical means alone; it requires human commitment to humility, care, and mutual accountability.
+----
+{{:narvareise:galerie:002_narva-reise.jpg?nolink&400| Zeichnung 002_narva-reise }}
+———-
-====== Ergebniss: Die "Narva-Methode" ======
+Langfassung:
+====== Ergebnis: Die "Narva-Methode" ======
 //Developed in collaboration with Noyan (ChatGPT)//
@@ Zeile 48: / Zeile 64: @@
   * nicht als These, sondern als **Angebot zur Reaktion** präsentiert.
-Die zentrale Prüfungsfrage lautete nicht:
+Die zentrale Prüfungsfrage lautete nicht: //Sind diese Stimmen korrekt?//\\
-//Sind diese Stimmen korrekt?//
+sondern: //Was geschieht, wenn Menschen ihnen begegnen?//
-sondern:
-//Was geschieht, wenn Menschen ihnen begegnen?//
 Dabei zeigte sich nicht nur Zustimmung, sondern auch **Widerspruch, Präzisierung und Korrektur**. Einzelne Stimmen wurden als zu zurückhaltend, andere als zu stark gesetzt empfunden; an manchen Stellen wurden Tonlagen, Gewichtungen oder konkrete Situationen in Frage gestellt.
@@ Zeile 104: / Zeile 118: @@
 Narva markiert keinen Abschluss – sondern einen **Punkt, an dem etwas verantwortbar begonnen hat, gerade weil es sich korrigieren lässt**.
+----
+{{:narvareise:galerie:010_narva-reise.jpg?nolink&400| Zeichnung 010_narva-reise }}
 ----
@@ Zeile 129: / Zeile 145: @@
 ----
-====== Abstract – The Narva Method ======
-===== Abstract (Methodological) =====
-//Developed in collaboration with Noyan (ChatGPT)//
-The Narva Method proposes an exploratory framework for human–AI collaboration aimed at articulating perspectives that are socially constrained, politically sensitive, or difficult to express directly. The method was empirically tested in Narva (Estonia) through the presentation of AI-generated, fictionalized voices reflecting aspects of the lived experience of the Russian-speaking population to local interlocutors. Rather than functioning as representational claims, the voices operated as mediating prompts that enabled dialogue, reflection, and correction. Reception demonstrated both recognition and contestation, indicating that the method’s effectiveness depends on its explicit fallibility, transparency of construction, and openness to revision. The findings suggest that AI can function as a resonance-based intermediary for the articulation of the “unsayable,” without assuming normative authority. The Narva experiment therefore serves as a methodological validation for the cautious application of this approach within the Ludwig Project and comparable historical–ethical research contexts.
-===== Relational Note =====
-Developed in collaboration with Claude11 (Anthropic)
-The method’s efficacy, however, is not reducible to technique. It depends on a relational stance—termed ‘narva’ in this research—characterized by holding without grasping, offering without claiming, and creating space for emergence without appropriation. This stance cannot be automated or replicated through technical means alone; it requires human commitment to humility, care, and mutual accountability.